Consumer contract law and procedural obstacles

Posted by Bob Schmitz, Union Luxembourgeoise des Consommateurs on January 6th, 2010
Organization: Union Luxembourgeoise des Consommateurs
In reaction to the EurActiv article:

EU chief plans civil code

Sir,

Regarding ‘EU justice chief plans civil code, privacy laws‘:

So far EU approximation of consumer contract law has shied away from fixing common sanctions and common procedural rules. In Luxembourg, we just lost after 12 years a cross-border package travel case with a Belgian tour operator. He invoked a one-year statutory limit to go to court as laid down in his country when Belgium implemented the package travel directive. The directive is silent on this issue.

In Luxembourg our normal civil code limit of 30 years should have applied as the tour operator acted in our country. Germany has a two-year limit for package travel. In France the five-year civil code limit is mandatory for B2C.

Viviane Reding’s ambitions should be to achieve a high level of harmonised substantive provisions and to add some common civil sanctions and key procedural rules for cross-border litigation.

This would be a first significant step towards the ultimate goal of an EU civil code.

Bob Schmitz

Union Luxembourgeoise des Consommateurs

Leave a Reply »»

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

EurActiv – Letters to the Editor rss

Let Europe know! Your opinion counts; send a letter to the Editor.

Advertisement